The Space Between What Happens and What We Think Happened

The Space Between What Happens and What We Think Happened

Recently, someone close to me sent a message I didn’t completely understand.

Did she not want me around? Did she want me to ask permission? Or did her response reveal something deeper about our relationship?

I didn’t know.

But my mind quickly filled in the blanks.

Based partly on the story I created, I changed my plans. Later, her explanation arrived: she wasn’t telling me not to come. She simply wanted me to ask first.

By then, life had already moved.

The experience revealed three very different things:

What actually happened.

What I thought it meant.

What I did because of what I thought it meant.

We face this constantly.

Someone doesn’t return a call. A message feels cold. A friend becomes quiet. Information is missing, so the mind creates a story.

Sometimes that story is accurate. Sometimes it isn’t. Either way, we may make real decisions based upon it.

Now, when something unsettles me, I try to ask:

What actually happened?

What story am I adding?

What am I about to do because of that story?

Intuition and experience still matter. My interpretation may be correct. But until I know more, it remains a possibility—not a fact.

The ego dislikes uncertainty. It wants immediate explanations and clear answers. When information is missing, it may manufacture certainty.

What I call the soul—the quieter, observing part of me—seems more comfortable saying:

I don’t know yet.

We make decisions with incomplete information because incomplete information is usually all we have. We cannot return to the roads we didn’t take and discover where they would have led.

We can only become more conscious of how we choose the next one.

The ego looks backward and asks:

Did I take the right turn?

The soul looks around and asks:

What can I learn from where I am now?

Perhaps wisdom is learning to distinguish what happened, what I imagined, and what I am choosing because of it.

The Space Between What Happens and What We Think Happened

Recently, I told someone close to me that I was thinking about going to a cabin where I often spend time.

Her response felt unexpectedly territorial—as though I should have asked before assuming I could come.

I wasn’t sure what she meant. Did she not want me there? Did she simply want me to ask first? Or was she saying something deeper about our relationship?

So I did what minds do remarkably well.

I filled in the blanks.

Perhaps she was asserting control. Perhaps she didn’t appreciate what I had contributed around the cabin. Perhaps her response revealed something about how she viewed our relationship.

I didn’t know, but my mind was already building a story.

I asked her what she meant. Then came silence.

During that silence, something important happened:

Life continued without the missing information.

I still had decisions to make. Based partly on my interpretation, I made other plans.

Later, her explanation arrived.

She wasn’t telling me not to come. She simply wanted me to ask rather than tell her when I was coming.

Fair enough.

But by then, life had already moved.

The Mind Fills the Blank

That small experience revealed something much larger.

There was what she meant.

There was what I thought she might mean.

And there was what I did because of what I thought she might mean.

Those are three different things.

Yet much of life seems to work this way.

Someone doesn’t return a call. A message feels cold. A facial expression looks different. A friend becomes unusually quiet.

Information is missing, and the mind dislikes an empty space.

So it creates a story.

Sometimes the story is accurate. Sometimes it isn’t. Either way, we may make real decisions based upon it.

Facts, Stories, and Choices

This gives me a practical way to catch my ego at work.

When something unsettles me, I can ask:

What actually happened?

What story am I adding?

What am I about to do because of that story?

This doesn’t mean my interpretation is necessarily wrong.

Intuition matters. Patterns matter. Experience matters. A subtle reaction may be telling me something important.

The point is to recognize an interpretation for what it is:

A possibility, not yet a fact.

That distinction creates a little space between an event and my response.

Sometimes that space is enough to keep me from reacting to something that never actually happened.

Choosing Without Knowing

Had I received her explanation immediately, perhaps I would have gone to the cabin.

Instead, I made another choice.

Maybe that changed nothing beyond one weekend. Or perhaps a conversation, relationship, idea, or realization occurred because I took one road rather than another.

I will never know.

Life contains countless moments like this:

A delayed response.

A misunderstanding.

A missed flight.

An invitation accepted or declined.

A decision made with incomplete information.

Each choice moves us onto a particular road, where new circumstances and choices appear.

The ego naturally looks backward and asks:

Did I choose the right road?

But that assumes a map exists showing exactly how my life was supposed to unfold.

I don’t have that map.

I only have the road beneath my feet.

Becoming Comfortable With Uncertainty

My ego doesn’t particularly like uncertainty.

It wants to know what someone meant, why something happened, and whether I made the correct decision. When pieces are missing, it sometimes manufactures them to create a complete picture.

What I call the soul—the quieter, observing part of me—seems more capable of saying:

I don’t know yet.

Perhaps wisdom is not knowing more, but becoming more comfortable with what I do not know.

The ego wants to resolve uncertainty.

The soul can sit beside it.

Sometimes the muddy water settles and something becomes clear. Other times it doesn’t.

Either way, life continues.

We make decisions with incomplete information because incomplete information is almost always what we have.

We interpret. We choose. New information arrives. Circumstances change.

I cannot go backward and discover what would have happened had I chosen differently. I can only become more conscious of how I choose now.

The ego looks backward and asks:

Did I take the right turn?

The soul looks around and asks:

What can I learn from where I am now?

Perhaps wisdom is not always knowing which road is right.

Perhaps it is learning to distinguish what happened, what I imagined, and what I am choosing because of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *